Wikipedia is a source for information; however, I often proceed with caution. A few years ago I started noticing that they labeled some people as being far-right and conspiracy theorist. Often times, those labels can be seen as subjective opinions. As a consequence of that, I began to have doubts with relevance to some information which they provided. Of course, it takes two to Tango, so I label them as being far-left often times.They still have the potential to be a great source for information, regardless.
Followers
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
On drug smuggling
Here is the scoop! Drug smuggling just got more dangerous than ever, that is, if those smugglers will be attempting to smuggle into the Unit...
-
Japan is considered one of the healthiest countries in the world. Japan has a high life expectancy. They have less obesity. This is credited...
-
Here's how it works. If hurricane Helene destroyed one's home, one applies for FEMA assistance and in ten days one gets a direct dep...
You're spot on. Wikipedia, I believe, is crowdsourced, so you have to be careful. Would love to see more transparency in the publication process, as I am also inclined to believe that far-leftists are disproportionately contributing to these pages to push their political narratives.
ReplyDeleteAri, thank you for sharing. Sounds like you're spot-on, as well.
ReplyDelete