Wikipedia is a source for information; however, I often proceed with caution. A few years ago I started noticing that they labeled some people as being far-right and conspiracy theorist. Often times, those labels can be seen as subjective opinions. As a consequence of that, I began to have doubts with relevance to some information which they provided. Of course, it takes two to Tango, so I label them as being far-left often times.They still have the potential to be a great source for information, regardless.
You're spot on. Wikipedia, I believe, is crowdsourced, so you have to be careful. Would love to see more transparency in the publication process, as I am also inclined to believe that far-leftists are disproportionately contributing to these pages to push their political narratives.
ReplyDeleteAri, thank you for sharing. Sounds like you're spot-on, as well.
ReplyDelete