Winning by rigging

Winning by rigging? Yes, it happens! Throughout human history it has always happened.

People cheat! Would you like a recent example? The 2021 Kentucky Derby.

Medina Spirit crossed the finish line first, which appeared to have given his trainer Bob Baffert a record seventh win in the race and jockey John Velazquez his fourth Derby win.[4] However, the horse tested positive for betamethasone after the race. The Kentucky Horse Racing Commission made the final decision to disqualify the horse on February 21, 2022.[5] Because Medina Spirit was disqualified, Mandaloun was named the winner.[6][7]( en.wikipedia.org).

How was the problem resolved? The second place became the winner. Not a very complicated solution. Now, Let’s switch subjects to United States elections.

What should be done if elections were rigged? Logic tells me things should be handled the same. In fact, it should be easier to resolve because if the resulting numbers were not correct, the second-place person was never really second place. The person was always first place. All one needs to do is review and investigate if there is evidence.

Cheating happens in every election, and usually the numbers are not significant enough to overturn the results. With relevance to the 2020 election, many continue to claim that the results were wrong. Mollie Hemingway has a book titled: Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections. Dinesh D'Souza has a film titled: 2000 Mules, which makes a similar claim. However, if one goes to the Wikipedia page for 2000 Mules, it will read that the claims are false. Millions of Americans have been very suspicious of the results. In fact, Donald Trump was asked what the biggest difference was between the 2016 and the 2020 elections, and his reply was that he got 12 million more votes in 2020. The reality is that the numbers of the 2020 elections were higher than any other in United States history. I have always said that this fact was very suspicious since numbers in previous years had declined instead of increasing. And the increase was overwhelming.

To conclude: I am still very suspicious of the results of the 2020 elections, and so are many millions of people.

 

References:

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/rigged-mollie-hemingway/1139396959

https://2000mules.com/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Kentucky_Derby

Did we see the receipt?

Did we see the itemized receipt for the $40 billion sent to Ukraine? Well, they might not be telling you, but Ukraine isn't winning. My advice, we could have saved the $40 billion by listening to Henry Kissinger who told us in 2014 that Ukraine will not be part of NATO. In fact, we could have used some of that money for the wall in the southern border, and still have money left for other things.

21 years old?

Raising the age to purchase a gun to 21, why this specific age? It is already the legal age for drinking. Interesting! I have some relevant bullet points and questions.

• Why 21?

• Who determined this age, how, and why?

• Shouldn't we change the minimum age to be in the military also to 21?

• Shouldn't we change the age for voting also to 21?

• Why not make it age 25, instead of 21?

• Did you know the brain isn't fully developed until age 25?

"Neuroscientists are confirming what car rental places already figured out — the brain doesn't fully mature until age 25. Up until this age, the prefrontal cortex — the part of the brain that helps curb impulsive behavior — is not yet fully developed. Nov 8, 2017 (www.businessinsider.com)."


One could argue that Matthew McConaughey seems to have accidentally stumbled into the real darkness in our society. Of course, he isn't the one who suggested this first. He's just someone's messenger. In fact, the fact that he (a Hollywood celebrity) can be easily invited to speak in a White House press conference raises many more other questions. Regardless, I think hypocrisy seems to be the real malignancy and darkness in our society.







Reference:

https://www.businessinsider.com/age-brain-matures-at-everything-2017-11

When Your Brain Matures at Everything
https://www.businessinsider.com/age-brain-matures-at-everything-2017-11

Spectators vs. participants

The world is usually much easier for the observer than for the one participating.

That wall was just way too expensive!

I cannot seriously understand what was the big deal about paying $25 billion for a southern border wall, when we can give away $40 billion to protect the border of another country, and it doesn't even include a permanent wall. Unless, there is something fishy going on with that money and somehow much of it ends up in the pockets of the swamp. Of course, all the brilliant people out there probably think this is a stupid assumption. You know all those people who think of themselves as being highly intelligent.

Constitutional isn't Fascism

I don't know if that Supreme Court leak was Wag the Dog stuff, but if it wasn't, it was probably a treasonous act by the "leaker." I am a skeptical person sometimes. The leak itself, to me, is probably a bigger concern then whether Roe v. Wade is overturned, or abortion rights go to the states. Of course, if you haven't seen Wag the Dog, which came out in 1997, I highly recommend it. Some things in the film may remind of the narrative being presented for the past couple of years with Covid-19.

Anyhow, if Pocahontas wasn't drama-queening yesterday, she might want to go get a beer before she has a heart attack. Let's not get ahead of ourselves. We don't know yet, what the Supreme Court will be doing. We're also not sinking into fascism, as Joy Behar would probably say. The Supreme Court Justices are placed there by elected presidents, that's our constitutional process at work. If the presidents we get are left leaning, they will likely appoint left leaning Justices, who must be approved by elected Senators. This process of appointing new Justices often takes decades, but I'm sure we would have very liberal outcomes from the Supreme Court, if most of the Justices were liberal.

To close, I want to continue living in a country (The United States) where ideas are heard from all sides with no censorship. Where Joy Behar and Marjorie Taylor Greene can say what they want. Although, at this time Behar has an upper hand being on Television. Censorship of ideas is what happens in a dictatorship, and not what Behar calls fascism, when it is simply our Constitutional process taking place. Oh, my apologies to Pocahontas, I meant Rep. Elizabeth Warren, but that was a tad overboard anticipation.

Hispanics speaking badly!

It's sad how many Hispanics in the United States are fascinated with the Spanish language and try to disrespectfully speak it around others who only speak English, or one language. Even more sad is the fact that many barely speak the language well, including guys on television like Jorge Ramos. Of course, I don't waste my time watching him...lol. I suppose what I am trying to say is that if they were welcomed here with arms wide open, they should show a little more respect. Moreover, I encourage them to learn English and practice it. At least speak one language well! Furthermore, I am not against deportation. Let's allow more Ukrainians in our country who need the help more urgently, instead.

Happy Easter!

 Happy Easter to all!

Rich dudes owning media companies

I hear that Elon Musk grew up in apartheid South Africa. Ok, so that means he may be racist, according to some who don't like that he may completely take control of Twitter soon. Of course, it's ok for Bezos to own the Washington Post. In case, the problem soon becomes about rich dudes owning media companies

Seven thousand daily

So, we are getting 7000 migrants daily through the southern border. 7,000 × 365 = 2,555,000 annually (over two and a half million, for those who don't understand numbers). But, we are only accepting 100 thousand Ukrainians. I wonder why? Busing 200 migrants to D.C. might not put a dent on the problem. Especially, if they go straight to Union Station and hop on a train to Miami as soon as they're dropped-off. Are people aware that we don't really know who's coming through. For all we know, we already have an invading army in here. I believe that the invading country doesn't have to declare it has invaded, according to the Geneva Convention rules of war.

What ever happened to the individual?

What bothers me most about Communists, radical liberals, and so-called social democrats is that they seem to think they are more compassionate and have more empathy than anyone. The truth is they're in denial about their own reality. Most of my experience with those personality types is that they're often major a**holes, rude, mean, and not good people. But in their mind, they want to be all that, which often couldn't be further from the truth. Bottomline, my experience with them has rarely been very good, and most often they don't want to accept their own condition.  Their use of the word progressive as a self-description is really propaganda since they're often not progressives, at all. Progressive, by definition, is the opposite of what they usually are…. However, there are always exceptions to the rules. But if the shoe fits wear it!

Of course, they will promote the collective ideology, using phrases like "united we stand, divided we fall." I say, says who? Often, most people are only brave when and if they're together with others in group settings. Most people don't usually stand up and go against the current, or tide. They go with what is popular. If one says something that is contrary to what is popular in our world today, one will likely be censored. You will be attacked by Big Tech, by government, or by all those who have had their brains hacked. For example, the narrative nowadays is that Zelensky in Ukraine is a brave guy, but Putin is a bad guy. Not that it is wrong! However, if the narrative suddenly changed for some reason, and they started saying Putin is a good guy and Zelensky is bad, I guarantee most people will start to repeat it almost immediately. Why? Good question! The answer is probably either their brains are easily hacked, or they are only brave when united to the collective. This is very troubling, and I can explain.

What ever happened to the individual? The individual has done more for humanity than the collective. The individual has helped humanity more than the collective, historically. Think about names like Einstein, Tesla, Alexander Graham Bell, Henry Ford, the Wright brothers, and many others whom without, the world would be much more drastically different than it is today.

I don’t have anything against Unitarians, or Communist, but I really don't need that much unity. I'm not a Republican. I'm not a Democrat. I am probably more of an independent libertarian. I don't classify myself belonging to any groups, except a Christian in my understanding of it. I am probably more conservative than liberal by current standards. I might be socially liberal, but fiscally conservative. Regardless, I really hope most people wake up soon because their minds are being hacked by media and I don’t think they seem to be aware of the fact.

To conclude, I am not saying we don't need numbers or unity. Some occasions call for it...some...not all. I am done here. Blessings!