DST again, still?

There are those who believe - that today, they have gained an extra hour of sun by losing an hour of sleep. Let's figure this one out! We will be forced by government to be sleep deprived for 8 months on DST, but still, the day on the planet remains 24 hours, and not 25. That's some strange mathematics! What just, really, happened?

Many wonder why they have problems sleeping and feel tired throughout the day. Perhaps they are not aware of all the many symptoms of Circadian Rythm Disorder. Moving the clock forward to pretend it's a different time of day will not adjust our circadian rhythm, in fact, it throws it out of whack. Sleep deprivation can be blamed for many health problems and accidents, and that's probably fine, if one enjoys paying more for pharmaceuticals and insurance, to put it lightly because sometimes accidents are fatal. No, this is not dramaqueening, as some would call it. This is about an annual mistake made for 8 months every year which shouldn't be made.

We already were on the correct time, Standard Time, which is normal time. Now, we are on something that they want many to believe is Daylight Saving Time (DST). The name given to it alone is the propaganda and rhetoric used to fool people (it's just another deceptive marketing strategy). If they were really honest and sincere, they would call DST by what it really is and by all the problems it causes such as sleep deprivation, accidents, health problems, and all other related ramifications. Hopefully, some are seeing with more clarity after reading this. Conclusion: let's abolish DST before it one day abolishes us.

You can't go to the next phase until you finish the one you are on

You can't go to the next phase until you finish the one you are on.

How fatal is Covid-19 when compared to other viruses?

Among the ten major virus outbreaks in the last 50 years, Marburg ranked first in terms of the fatality rate with 80 percent. In comparison, the recent novel coronavirus, originating from the Chinese city of Wuhan, had an estimated fatality rate of 2.2 percent as of January 31, 2020.





Source:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1095129/worldwide-fatality-rate-of-major-virus-outbreaks-in-the-last-50-years/

Pernicious actions

The pernicious actions of Congress and mainstream media will eventually cause a reaction from the public. I just don't know at this time what the level of intensity of the reaction and response will be, but it will take place sooner or later. History has overwhelming evidence of all sorts when it comes to public reaction to abuse of power and harm inflicted wrongfully. Of course, the word insidious should also be taken into consideration with regard....

Does this remind?

They use the power of a tax funded office to gain wealth. Cronyism and nepotistim are tools used as leverage with that same power of the office. Abuse of power! They use mainstream media to make a lie seem like truth. They want to appear like the most generous and empathetic. They will do whatever it takes to make one believe they care. They waste other people's money, but save their own. They will do a full scale attack on whoever exposes, or tries to expose their coverup. Does this remind us of anyone, or any group? DTS!

Virtual?

I don't know if we should keep this home school virtual world thing going on for much longer. As it is, post internet social skills are already pretty bizarre. Can anyone imagine another evolution layer on top of what it already is? There must be more to it than just the Covid-19 excuse.

Of course, the more time we spend online the deeper we go into a virtual world outside of reality.  They already try to create the narrative they want us to believe. That narrative is almost like a parallel universe that is not physically manifested. However, it is what they want us to believe. I've said before it's like a holographic world created by words, but not really real. I have no idea how it all will end, but obviously it's much easier to control people that have no clue about what is really going on. 

Labels with an intent

The left has always dominated using rhetoric and labeling for defining with the intent of achieving their agendas, whether it is an attempt at global dominance, or just to diminish, tarnish, and smear their opposition. Some examples of this lately are phrases such as domestic terrorist or conspiracy theorist. Usually, it's just when the labels seem to be useful for a moment in time. For instance, If you are beginning to expose some of their secrets, you might probably be labeled a conspiracy theorist. I am not saying there is no such thing as a conspiracy theorist or a domestic terrorist. Both of the foregoing are real and exist, but the problem is when those who control information place one under these labels dishonestly for specific purposes and many who read or hear them used in sentences by politicians or mainstream media often simply believe without questioning whether what is being said is really true within context. Here's another popular one, calling people white supremacists. When this foregoing phrase is used they will often compare those labeled to Confederates during the American Civil War. The irony behind this is when a Democrat politician says it about their counterpart, they are deliberately attempting to change historical facts. Why? Well, for one, the Republican party was formed as a party of Abolitionists. Systemic racism is another popular phrase lately. A popular word since January 6, 2021 is insurrectionist. Anyhow, I hope you get the idea.

If we listen close and pay attention, we may often easily notice when words are being used with the intent of diminishing or smearing. When we suddenly, out of the blue, start hearing certain things repeated over and over, and over it is basically that they are at it again with the smear campaigns and deceptive tactics (lies!)....

Obviously, much of the rhetoric is just a bunch of hot air regardless of how many sources are conveying it. And also, it's obvious many people don't buy it since right wing media normally has higher ratings than the left.

Posts

If you see nothing new posted, I am probably taking a temporary or an intermitent hiatus.

AOC's brilliance

AOC seems to be brilliant. While still being young, she figured out that following in her father's footsteps and doing architecture wasn't going to be easy, politics was probably a better choice. And, if politics didn't work out, getting into comedy would be a natural outcome, while never burning the bridge to return to bartending. Do you see what I see?

No identity!

Remember when unemployment was 3.9%? That was exactly a year ago! Good luck seeing that again! People with no identity who don't question when they are told a lie deserve all they get in return.

Posts

If you see nothing new posted, I am probably taking a temporary or an intermitent hiatus.