Did Donald Trump win the popular vote by many millions more than reported?

Trump himself says that he won by many millions more in the popular vote, and that the 2024 presidential election was "too big to rig." The fact is that the official report says he got more than 77 million votes, and Kamala got around 75 million; consequently, he did beat her by over 2 million votes. Is it possible that this is an error and that he probably won by perhaps 5 million more votes, or so?

Let's look at the state of California alone. California, we know, made voter IDs unlawful. In fact, it was even illegal to ask for any type of ID, in order to vote there in 2024. Well, seeing things through this lens, one can establish there was a huge potential for cheating.

In California, Kamala supposedly beat Trump by over 3 million votes. Still, she lost in the nationwide vote. Where I am very skeptical most about the counting is actually in the state of California.

I suppose people who have believed the lies from mainstream media, supposed fact checkers, and Congressmen like Adam Schiff for the past eight years or more most likely think Trump is a huge liar. Moreover, those same people probably think we have now become a fascist state and that Trump is a dictator, if they haven't fact checked their sources all this time. The truth is that Trump won by democratic vote. Democracy seems to be alive and well in these United States. I will stop here. 

We need improvement in our education system

The problem we have in the United States today is that many citizens haven't quite realized the fact that anyone can be an attorney, but not anyone can be a heart surgeon or a nuclear a physicist. 

By the way, this post was inspired by that low creature, Shifty Schiff, who by the way is an attorney. No offense, if you happen to be one.

Private vs public

If you are not willing to say it publicly, you are not as brave as you may think you are....

Drain it!

Drain the widespread swamp corruption (local, state, federal, and global)....

Dynastic nepotistim

Dynastic nepotism is fine in a family owned business, but it's not OK in government where they are playing around with money that isn't theirs. The money from taxes and any other similar means which is taken from the citizens forcefully and almost at gun point must be managed ethically and efficiently. Drain the widespread swamp!

Happy 2025!

Happy New Year to all!

Excerpt from the Gospel of Luke

Once Jesus (he) was asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God was coming, and he answered, “The kingdom of God is not coming with things that can be observed, nor will they say, ‘Look, here it is!’ or ‘There it is!’ For, in fact, the kingdom of God is among (within) you.”

- Luke 17: 20-21, NRSVUE 

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas to all!

How to easily identify the widespread swamp

The phrase drain the swamp has gained a great deal of momentum, but when one hears some talk about the swamp, it doesn't sound like they may understand the fullness of it.

The swamp is far-reaching. It's both republican and democrat (a bipartisan thing). It is indeed widespread, reaching from D.C. at the top and down to local governments all-around the country, and vice-versa. It's existence is reliant and greatly involves using the leverage of public offices for the purpose of gaining wealth and prosperity, but it has other traits as well.

Swamp members are always politically correct, and walk the political fence. Not all are politicians, some are influencers and such. I could call out many by name, but will refrain for now. Some of them are religious groups that claim they are not political. They sometimes may seem like wheat vs chaff, but are still identifiable. They are usually all about pretending and acting, and doing what's apparently popular to maintain success permanently. Really, it's all about keeping a constant survival strategy. They can survive in any type of political environment. I will illustrate. Swift knew it was highly likely that Kamala seemed to be the most popular who would win and she supported her based on this confidence, which was perhaps media created. This is just a small example. The swamp and corruption are synonymous regardless of how subtle or hidden. So, how does one start to drain the swam?

To drain the swamp, the press and media must be separated from government in every way. Furthermore, they must stop endorsing political candidates.  NPR and PBS, for instance, have to become independent, for one thing.

How does one end swamp corruption? Nepotism, cronyism, and favoritism must stop on ALL government levels (federal and local). This would be the best start. There must be accountability with all federal money going to capital improvement projects, grants, and such. Moreover, contractors whether actual or potential must not be related or be cronies with anyone awarding contracts. To reiterate, media being separated from government is of utmost importance. In fact, it is a much bigger problem than church and state unity. All mentioned thus far is just barely scratching the surface. Bottom line, the swamp must be drained. I will stop here, for now.

Addendum: government corruption and hypocrisy can almost always be associated with the swamp. 

Innovate

Create a new thing! Write a new song! If you decide to cover the song, change it up and make a different arrangement. Always remember, something old and something new. 

You may have not or will not recognize

Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for by doing that some have entertained angels without knowing it. 

- Hebrews 13: 2, NRSVUE