Presidential integrity

Why does the person one elects as president matter, especially that person's integrity? Very often the United States president pardons people who committed crimes. Usually, this happens just before the person leaves office. I can give examples of potential candidates, which could be anyone. Nikolas Cruz, for instance, was recently sentenced. Any president down the road can pardon him, including Biden. Speaking of Biden, I don't see why one would pursue a conviction for his son Hunter during his term for this very same reason. Who one elects has lasting results.

As Obama once said: "elections have consequences." Of course Obama also said: "“How hard can that be, saying that Nazis are bad?" Out of context there is nothing wrong with that statement; however, I would like to also hear how hard can that be, saying that communists are bad? We don't hear that enough, and in modern human history communists murdered many millions more humans than Nazis. But it's really not just a comment, it's a narrative that's being established for a reason and a purpose; however, that's a whole other topic for another post.

My personal destination quote

It's better to get there one inch at a time than to never get there.

What you believe you know

Most people don't think they are naive, but that doesn't mean that they aren't. Regardless, this post is geared towards naive people, which may include this author sometimes

In our world we have a lot of people who are laughing all the way to the bank by pretending they are naive, this includes a lot of celebrities, and some who host late night TV shows. They're going to keep on playing the roles and following the scripts, otherwise it would jeopardize their sources of income and upward mobility, but still they're lying and they know it. The Media creates the desired outcomes for the agenda of the establishment (deep state, swamp, cabal...etc.).

Many of our politicians are Media creations. Traditionally, one could never become president after serving only 2 years as a Senator when practically no one knew who the person was before then. Justify with Harvard Law Review, community organizer, or any way in which the grooming took place, but ultimately...a Media creation. They want you to believe your smart because you learned and believe their narrative. He who controls information controls the narrative. Mitt Romney was the challenger, enough said. Of course, this is just one Media creation of many. Go back and read this from the beginning again is my suggestion. 

How to start waking up?

The type of programming a computer gets is determined by the information put into it. Maybe that's not how this post should start, but that's entirely up to me, the author...lol. So,.let's see where this goes.

As humans, we are born into the world without being previously programed, unlike a computer we purchase at a store. We become informed as we grow up and age. The more information, the more intelligent we usually become. Of course, what type of information we receive is usually determined by what we decide to allow into our mind via our senses. Is it possible that other humans, who may want to have power and control over other humans, would try to control sources of information to program them into believing things that are false? In other words, would other power-hungry humans use media and sources of information to deceive in order to get and retain power? I will let you decide on an answer to that question for yourself. What we hear, see, smell, touch, and taste provides us with much information.

There are many sources such as radio which play what is considered popular music, but who determines what will be allowed to get airplay? Not just anyone can write and record a song, and anyone will play it on air immediately. Sure, you may want to believe the narrative that only the good stuff makes it to the top of the charts, but that's really not the case, regardless of whichever supposedly credible source says that's how it is. All that's needed is frequent airplay and sooner or later many start to believe that's what is supposed to be good.

Films and television, and many other media sources are used and geared towards establishing a narrative. Basically, whoever controls information controls the narrative. Oftentimes there are subtle and subliminal messages in all which are not really so noticeable on the surface. For example, a film can have a message about evil NAZIS, which isn’t false, but you probably don't hear much about evil communists in stories about our world history. If one analyzes the data, it is easy to decide that communist leftist regimes murdered more humans and abused power more than NAZIS. If one pays attention, the way many Hollywood films portray evil NAZIS is more abundant than how evil communists are portrayed. This hasn't always been the case. One should question this by asking why?

These day we are even told what to eat. For example, this meat is bad but that one is good. I don't know, but one can control what types of brain nutrients one gets depending on what we eat. I think how much we eat is definitely an issue. A basic balanced diet in which we don't abuse is usually fine. I didn't write this to focus on all senses, however. This is about how a certain group of humans want to exercise power and control over others.

Marketing research and studies have existed for a long time, and the information gathered has helped to determine the strategy for control. They want to control how you think, how you vote, behave, and what you think are the correct values to have in this so called modern society by programming you with the information they decide and allow. In case, you haven't noticed these things I've discussed on here previously, start paying attention and you'll soon begin to awaken. By the way, I am barely scratching the surface on this subject. It is really a much deeper issue.

My politics

Politically, I am really a progressive independent, based on my worldview. I don't think political parties should have patrimony over that ideology. Of course, I am a little more right of center according to those who think they are left of center. The whole problem with left or right of center is that we really can't allow anyone to decide what is center based on the amount of noise they can make. Bottom line: who decides what is the center? To give credit where credit is due, this post was inspired by a recent Trey Gowdy program opening. I am done here...lol.

The empathy alarms

Yes, there are many who did the soup kitchen thing 5 years ago and are still sounding the empathy alarm. Of course, that's fine if you don't use it to judge others. Jesus, however, supposedly said the following.

“So whenever you give alms, do not sound a trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, so that they may be praised by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward. But when you give alms, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, (Matthew 6:2-3) ….

I would assume we all catch Jesus’ drift on this. Obviously, keeping it quite on acts of charity is probably the best route. This isn’t saying not to be charitable, but it is saying don’t be like hypocrites when doing so. 

Hope you enjoyed reading. Blessings!

 

 

Reference:

New Revised Standard Version Updated Edition

Looking at the big story?

Very often the big story they want you to see isn't really as big as the one they don't want you to see. There is usually a reason and a purpose, and one should be questioning why. For a miniscule instance, if they want me to view the pound sterling, I would question why shouldn't I also be looking at the European dollar? In other words, why do you want me to see something looking the other way, and not another in a different direction. Is someone hiding something, perhaps?