Thursday, March 5, 2020

DST is Unhealthy and Dangerous

The government knows about the heart attacks and all, it's not just the National Geographic author in the referenced article making it up. The Congressional Research Service has had all the information. For example, in their own studies they have found the following:

"potential health effects associated with the spring and fall transition to DST and found a cumulative effect of sleep loss and increased risk for incidence of acute myocardial infarction in specific subgroups (Congressional Research Service)."

Of course, the common man hears the phrase myocardial infarction and doesn't immediately think it's a heart attack. Maybe it's not deceptive, but one wonders. Also, the sleep loss happens after the spring change, not the fall. In the fall, we gain sleep. Sleep loss is extremely unhealthy!

Below is an excerpt from the referenced article.

"The impacts of this change, and the paired “falling back” of the clocks in autumn, run from mild annoyances to potentially severe consequences, including higher risk of heart attacks, fatal car crashes, and harsher judicial sentences. Yet with many business interests siding with the annual observance of daylight saving time—often incorrectly called daylight “savings” time—the pesky time change persists across most of the United States (nationalgeographic.com)."


References:

Congressional Research Service


1 comment:

  1. Below is a relevant article.


    Why Should We Abolish Daylight Saving Time?

    Roenneberg T1, Wirz-Justice A2, Skene DJ3, Ancoli-Israel S4, Wright KP5, Dijk DJ6, Zee P7, Gorman MR8, Winnebeck EC1, Klerman EB9.


    Abstract

    Local and national governments around the world are currently considering the elimination of the annual switch to and from Daylight Saving Time (DST). As an international organization of scientists dedicated to studying circadian and other biological rhythms, the Society for Research on Biological Rhythms (SRBR) engaged experts in the field to write a Position Paper on the consequences of choosing to live on DST or Standard Time (ST). The authors take the position that, based on comparisons of large populations living in DST or ST or on western versus eastern edges of time zones, the advantages of permanent ST outweigh switching to DST annually or permanently. Four peer reviewers provided expert critiques of the initial submission, and the SRBR Executive Board approved the revised manuscript as a Position Paper to help educate the public in their evaluation of current legislative actions to end DST.

    KEYWORDS:

    DST; circadian; entrainment; health; light; sleep


    Source:

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31170882

    ReplyDelete